<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">BRJ</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Balkan Research Journal</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BRJ</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="print">2955-2516</issn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2955-2524</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Balkan University Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.69648/RNFD2777</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">304</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal to Decide on Its Own Jurisdiction</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Gjorgjieva</surname>
            <given-names>Dijana</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <institution>International Vision University, Gostivar, North Macedonia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-05-31">
        <day>31</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>25</fpage>
      <lpage>35</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">
          <license-p>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://brj.ibupress.com/articles/jurisdiction-of-the-arbitral-tribunal-to-decide-on-its-own-jurisdiction" />
      <abstract>
        <p>Competence de compétence (German: Gerichtsverfassungsrecht ; French: Kompetenz-Kompetenz ; Spanish: Competencia para determinar la competencia ) is a core concept of arbitration procedural law. It is a specific principle aimed at preventing the arbitral process from being undermined at the outset by state courts, as well as eliminating the possibility of a positive conflict of jurisdictions (between arbitrate and state courts).</p>
        <p>Simultaneously, by acknowledging the arbitral tribunal’s power to rule independently on its own jurisdiction and on any jurisdictional objections raised by the parties, arbitration is affirmed as a separate and autonomous alternative means of resolving disputes. Owing to its efficiency and speed, it increasingly displaces the traditional idea of state court litigation.</p>
        <p>For this reason, it can rightly be concluded that the competence de compétence is the cornerstone ( pierre angulaire ) of arbitration, and thus a challenge for every researcher. This is because, through this doctrine, the autonomy of arbitration vis-vis state adjudication is protected, and the effectiveness of arbitral justice is ensured.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
        <kwd>Competence de compétence</kwd>
        <kwd>arbitral jurisdiction</kwd>
        <kwd>autonomy</kwd>
        <kwd>state courts</kwd>
        <kwd>dispute resolution</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="r1">
        <mixed-citation>Boucaron-Nardetto, M. (2011). Le principe de compétence-compétence en droit de l’arbitrage . Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (Doctoral thesis).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r2">
        <mixed-citation>Boisson de Chazournes, L. (2010). The principle of compétence de la compétence in international adjudication and its role in an era of multiplication of courts and tribunals. In M. Arsanjani, J. Cogan, &amp; S. Weissner (Eds.), Looking to the future: Essays in honor of W. Michael Reisman (pp. 1027–1064). Martinus Nijhoff.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r3">
        <mixed-citation>González de Cossío, F. (2007). El principio compétence-compétence revisitado. Revista de Arbitragem e Mediação, 4 (13), 100–122.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r4">
        <mixed-citation>Gorgieva, D., &amp; Doneva, N. (2025). Prohibition of double and multiple lis pendens in court proceedings: Solutions and dilemmas in Macedonian law. The Review of Law, International Politics and Economics, 1 (2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17931126 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5281/zenodo.17931126</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r5">
        <mixed-citation>Herrmann, G. (1994). The arbitration agreement as the foundation of arbitration and its recognition by the courts. In A. J. van den Berg (Ed.), International arbitration in a changing world (ICCA Congress Series, Vol. 6, pp. 41–50). Kluwer Law International.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r6">
        <mixed-citation>Jakeli, M. (2023). Competence-competence principle in international commercial arbitration [Master’s thesis, Mykolas Romeris University].</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r7">
        <mixed-citation>Kalantzi, A. (2023). Parallel arbitral proceedings: An analysis of the issue of parallel arbitrations in international commercial arbitration within the European legal space. The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law, 3 (1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010001 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1163/27725650-03010001</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r8">
        <mixed-citation>Law on Civil Procedure. (2010). Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia , No. 116/2010.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r9">
        <mixed-citation>Law on International Commercial Arbitration of the Republic of Macedonia. (2006). Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia , No. 39/2006.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r10">
        <mixed-citation>Samuel, A. (1989). Jurisdictional problems in international commercial arbitration: A study of Belgian, Dutch, English, French, Swedish, Swiss, U.S. and West German law . Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r11">
        <mixed-citation>Stanković, G. (1999). Arbitražno procesno pravo . Pravni fakultet, Niš.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r12">
        <mixed-citation>Triva, S., &amp; Dika, M. (2004). Građansko parnično procesno pravo [Civil procedural law]. Narodne novine.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r13">
        <mixed-citation>Triva, S., &amp; Uzelac, A. (2007). Hrvatsko arbitražno pravo [Croatian arbitration law]. Narodne novine.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r14">
        <mixed-citation>Zoroska-Kamilovska, T. (2015). Арбитражно право [Arbitration Law]. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Faculty of Law “Iustinianus Primus”.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>