ABSTRACT
In the digital age, online media has become a key platform for public
political communication, reshaping the landscape of political discourse
and social engagement. This paper proposes a typology framework to
classify various forms of online media and elaborate on their distinct
roles and functions in political communication. Using interdisciplinary
research perspectives from media studies, political science, and communi-
cation theory, the typology categorizes online media into distinct types,
explaining how they determine communication in the political sphere.
Furthermore, the paper examines how different types of online media
are utilized by political actors, interest groups, and citizens to dissemi-
nate information, mobilize political support, shape public opinion, and
improve civic engagement. The scope of the research includes a review of
existing case studies on online media in North Macedonia and Western
Balkans, combined with empirical analysis of prominent platforms across
different types and demographics. Cultural and linguistic biases may
influence the interpretation of findings, particularly in cross-cultural
analyses. By mapping out the diverse ecosystem of online media and
their different uses in public political communication, this typology
contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between
technology, media, and politics in the digital era. A sample analysis will
be presented, illustrating the application of the typological framework
to a selection of popular online media platforms
REFERENCES
Ampuja, M. (2012). Theorizing Globalization. A Critique of the Mediatization of Social Theory. Lei-
den: Brill.
Balkin, J. M. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for
the information society. New York University Law Review, 79(1), 1-58
Bachovska, J. (2018). Strengthening professional standards or erosion of free speech: Regulation of
online media in Macedonia. Institute for Communication Studies.
Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. (2018). Challenging truth and trust: A global inventory of organized social
media manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford
Bryman, A. (2001). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Cardoso, G. (2006). The Media in Network Society. CIES.
Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks,
and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
616(1), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
Curran, J. and Seaton, J. (2010). Power without Responsibility: Press, broadcasting and Internet in
Britain (7th edition). Routledge.
Dzigal, S. (2021). New media and internet warfare. Macedonian Institute for Media.
Flew, T. (2007). Understanding Global Media. Palgrave MacMillan.
Dahlgren, P., & Gurevitch, M. (2005). Political communication in a changing world. In J. Curran
(Ed.), Mass Media and Society, 4th ed. (pp. 375-393). Hodder Arnold Publication.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media and the public sphere. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Cri-
tique, 12(1), 57-101. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552
Fuller, J. (1996). News Values, Ideas for an Information Age. University of Chicago Press.
Koçan, G. (2008). Models of public sphere in political philosophy. Eurosphere No. 2,
pp. 01-32.
Nimmo, D. (1978). Political Communication and Public Opinion in America. Goodyear publishing
company.
Wardle, C. & Derakshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for
research and policy making. Council of Europe Press Strasbourg.