Özet
In the digital age, online media has become a key platform for public political communication, reshaping the landscape of political discourse and social engagement. This paper proposes a typology framework to classify various forms of online media and elaborate on their distinct roles and functions in political communication. Using interdisciplinary research perspectives from media studies, political science, and communi-cation theory, the typology categorizes online media into distinct types, explaining how they determine communication in the political sphere. Furthermore, the paper examines how different types of online media are utilized by political actors, interest groups, and citizens to dissemi-nate information, mobilize political support, shape public opinion, and improve civic engagement. The scope of the research includes a review of existing case studies on online media in North Macedonia and Western Balkans, combined with empirical analysis of prominent platforms across different types and demographics. Cultural and linguistic biases may influence the interpretation of findings, particularly in cross-cultural analyses. By mapping out the diverse ecosystem of online media and their different uses in public political communication, this typology contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology, media, and politics in the digital era. A sample analysis will be presented, illustrating the application of the typological framework to a selection of popular online media platforms
Anahtar kelimeler
Kaynaklar
- Ampuja, M. (2012). Theorizing Globalization. A Critique of the Mediatization of Social Theory. Lei-den: Brill.
- Balkin, J. M. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. New York University Law Review, 79(1), 1-58
- Bachovska, J. (2018). Strengthening professional standards or erosion of free speech: Regulation of online media in Macedonia. Institute for Communication Studies.
- Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. (2018). Challenging truth and trust: A global inventory of organized social media manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford
- Bryman, A. (2001). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
- Cardoso, G. (2006). The Media in Network Society. CIES.
- Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
- Curran, J. and Seaton, J. (2010). Power without Responsibility: Press, broadcasting and Internet in Britain (7th edition). Routledge.
- Dzigal, S. (2021). New media and internet warfare. Macedonian Institute for Media.
- Flew, T. (2007). Understanding Global Media. Palgrave MacMillan.
- Dahlgren, P., & Gurevitch, M. (2005). Political communication in a changing world. In J. Curran
- (Ed.), Mass Media and Society, 4th ed. (pp. 375-393). Hodder Arnold Publication.
- Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media and the public sphere. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Cri-tique, 12(1), 57-101. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552
- Fuller, J. (1996). News Values, Ideas for an Information Age. University of Chicago Press.
- Koçan, G. (2008). Models of public sphere in political philosophy. Eurosphere No. 2, pp. 01-32.
- Nimmo, D. (1978). Political Communication and Public Opinion in America. Goodyear publishing company.
- Wardle, C. & Derakshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe Press Strasbourg.
Yorumlar
Henüz yorum yok. Makale hakkındaki soru ve görüşlerinizi bekliyoruz.